Key Points:
- Self-care is a shared professional responsibility, not just an individual task.
- Trainees must develop consistent self-care habits and self-awareness.
- Supervisors must model, mentor, and reinforce wellness practices.
- Programs must create a culture and policies that protect trainee well-being.
- Collective collaboration builds a healthier, more sustainable mental health workforce.
As we conclude this series on embedding self-care into mental health education and practicum supervision, one truth stands clear: self-care cannot thrive in isolation.
While individual effort matters, sustainable self-care in the training of counsellors demands collective commitment—from trainees, supervisors, educators, and institutions alike.
This final article explores how different stakeholders must work together to create a professional culture where self-care is valued, protected, and practiced consistently.
Why Self-Care Must Be a Shared Commitment
The traditional view frames self-care as a purely personal responsibility.
While personal accountability is essential, this view ignores the powerful role that systems and relationships play in shaping wellness behaviours (Grise-Owens et al., 2018).
Without support, role modeling, and systemic reinforcement, self-care becomes an uphill battle.
Conversely, when programs, supervisors, and trainees collaborate intentionally, self-care becomes a natural and expected part of professional life.
In mental health training, it takes a village to sustain wellness.
The Role of Trainees: Owning the Practice
Trainees bear responsibility for:
- Developing self-awareness of their needs and limits.
- Practicing consistent self-care behaviours.
- Seeking support proactively when needed.
Effective trainees recognize that self-care is not indulgent—it is an ethical obligation to themselves and their future clients (American Psychological Association, 2017).
Trainees must engage in:
- Creating personalized self-care plans (David & Achempim-Ansong, 2021).
- Reflecting regularly on emotional and physical well-being.
- Setting and maintaining healthy boundaries in clinical and academic work.
Practical Tip:
Trainees should treat self-care tasks with the same seriousness they give to academic and clinical responsibilities.
The Role of Supervisors: Modeling and Mentoring
Supervisors have immense influence over how trainees perceive self-care.
Their responsibilities include:
- Modeling healthy behaviours like boundary setting, self-reflection, and work-life balance.
- Normalizing discussions of wellness and vulnerability.
- Mentoring trainees in developing sustainable wellness practices.
Research emphasizes that supervisors who actively support self-care in supervision reduce trainee burnout and foster stronger professional identity development (Mack, 2022).
Practical Tip:
Supervisors can integrate wellness goals into supervision plans, making them a routine part of professional development discussions.
The Role of Training Programs: Building a Culture of Wellness
Institutions set the tone for whether self-care is possible or pressured out.
Programs must:
- Embed self-care into curricula and practicum requirements (Callan et al., 2021).
- Develop institutional policies that protect trainee wellness (Myers et al., 2022).
- Train faculty and supervisors to model and teach self-care consistently.
Without institutional support, trainees and supervisors alone cannot uphold wellness.
Practical Tip:
Training directors can organize regular wellness workshops, mandate reasonable practicum workloads, and provide access to mental health resources for students.
Key Strategies for Collective Success
How can trainees, supervisors, and programs work together to make self-care more than a slogan?
Here are five evidence-based strategies:
- Co-Create Wellness Agreements
At the beginning of practicum placements, supervisors and trainees can co-create wellness agreements.
These agreements might outline:
- Boundaries around after-hours communication.
- Plans for handling stress and crises.
- Regular self-care check-ins during supervision.
- Accessibility to Wellness resources.
Benefit: Shared expectations increase accountability and trust.
- Regularly Evaluate and Adapt Self-Care Plans
Self-care needs change over time.
Trainees should regularly evaluate their self-care plans—with supervisor support—and adapt them based on current stressors (Guler & Ceyhan, 2021).
Benefit: Flexibility keeps self-care relevant and prevents stagnation.
- Normalize Help-Seeking
Programs should explicitly teach that seeking help is a strength.
Faculty and supervisors can model this by sharing their own experiences accessing therapy, supervision, or peer support during difficult seasons (Curry & Epley, 2022).
Benefit: Reduces stigma and empowers trainees to seek help early.
- Institutionalize Self-Care Metrics
Programs can build self-care into formal evaluations.
This might include:
- Assessments of self-awareness and boundary maintenance.
- Reflective assignments on managing stress and maintaining wellness.
Benefit: Makes self-care development an expected and measurable outcome.
- Celebrate Wellness Wins
Recognition matters!
Programs and supervisors should celebrate when trainees demonstrate excellent self-care practices, just as they would celebrate clinical achievements.
Benefit: Positive reinforcement makes self-care culturally valued rather than optional.
The Cost of Inaction
When programs fail to prioritize self-care, the consequences are severe:
- Trainees burn out and may leave the profession early (Kaeding et al., 2017).
- Ethical breaches and client harm become more likely (Johnson et al., 2018).
- The profession loses skilled, compassionate clinicians to avoidable distress.
By contrast, when self-care is embedded systemically:
- Trainees develop into resilient, ethical practitioners.
- Clients receive better, safer care.
- The field of mental health is strengthened for future generations.
Self-care is not a private concern—it is a collective professional responsibility.
Conclusion: Building a Sustainable Profession
As we close this series, the call to action is clear.
- Trainees must own their self-care journeys.
- Supervisors must mentor and model wellness.
- Programs must structure and support a culture of health.
When all parties collaborate, self-care becomes woven into the professional DNA of counsellors-in-training.
Not a burdensome extra, but a foundational part of ethical, effective practice.
The health of our profession depends on it.
The health of our clients depends on it.
The health of each counsellor depends on it.
Together, we can build a mental health profession that cares for the caregivers—right from the start.
About the Author
Father Pishoy Wafsy
Rev. Fr. Dr. Pishoy Wasfy, PhD, MDiv, RP, is an ordained Coptic Orthodox priest serving in Mississauga, Ontario, and a Registered Psychotherapist with over 14 years of counselling experience. He holds a Ph.D. in Christian Counselling, a Master of Divinity in Clinical Counselling, and a Bachelor of Science in Pharmacy from the University of Toronto. Fr. Pishoy integrates clinical expertise with spiritual care, supporting individuals, couples, and families through his work at Cornerstone Family Counselling Services and broader community initiatives.

References
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
Callan, J. E., Smith, C. M., & Meiser, D. (2021). Self-care training methods in counselor education: A systematic review. Teaching and Supervision in Counseling, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc030101
Curry, J. R., & Epley, L. E. (2022). Reflective practice as self-care in counselor education and supervision. Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy, 9(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326716X.2022.2048991
David, S., & Achempim-Ansong, R. (2021). Student counsellor self-care: Conceptual and practical considerations. Journal of Counselling Practice, 8(1), 1–13.
Grise-Owens, E., Miller, J. J., & Eaves, M. (2018). Teaching note—Advancing self-care in social work education: Reflections on a pedagogical framework. Journal of Social Work Education, 54(1), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2017.1302857
Guler, D., & Ceyhan, E. (2021). Self-care training for counselor trainees: The effect on self-efficacy and resilience. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(2), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00483-1
Johnson, W. B., Barnett, J. E., Elman, N. S., Forrest, L., & Kaslow, N. J. (2018). The competent community: Toward a vital reformulation of professional ethics. American Psychologist, 73(6), 774–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000201
Mack, M. (2022). Supervision and self-care: Promoting resilience in counselor trainees. Counselor Education and Supervision, 61(3), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12219
Myers, S. B., Sweeney, A. C., Popick, V., & Wesley, K. (2022). Institutional barriers and supports for graduate student wellness: Perspectives from faculty and students. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 16(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000351